![]() ![]() Using Foundation, you have to wrangle with several libraries and build tools at the same time while with MJML, you can generate the output with a tool of your choice (NPM, Visual Studio Code plugin or even using a web service). The biggest difference between both is that Foundation is more complex than MJML. Because it’s hard to write the code that is most compatible by hand, there are two frameworks that makes life easier: MJML and Foundation for Emails. Both offer a simple syntax and generate the HTML/CSS code for you. Thus, the only way to get e-mails that look similar (not equal) in most clients is using tables and a limited set of inline CSS. Outlook falls into the later category and it seems that Microsoft wants to punish us forever! But often, simple features aren’t implemented since more than ten years or are buggy and therefore unusable. Most of the time, support is limited for security reasons which is a good thing because compared to web sites you have to visit actively, everyone can send you e-mails. Nevertheless, even nowadays, creating appealing e-mails for different devices is hard stuff! Software seem to be from year 2000 when comparing support for HTML5 and CSS in e-mail clients. They are still the best option to confirm the order and tell customers about changes in the delivery and payment status. MJML is such a fantastic tool to build responsive email newsletters without the hassle and I am super happy to see a proper and simple Rails integration.Every online shop needs to send e-mails and so the Aimeos e-commerce framework does. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |